Between One and Zero, Brahman and Śūnyatā: Same but Different, Different but Same
Abstract
Between One and Zero, Brahman and Śūnyatā: Same but Different, Different but Same
Dagyung Jung
This study explores the philosophical similarities and differences between Advaita Vedānta and Buddhism, two major Indian traditions concerned with consciousness, liberation, etc. While Advaita Vedānta sees Brahman as the singular, eternal reality underlying all existence, Buddhism emphasizes Śūnyatā, teaching that all phenomena are impermanent and devoid of inherent essence. The research compares how each tradition conceptualizes ultimate reality symbolized as binary code “1(one)” in Advaita Vedānta and “0(zero)” in Buddhism, arguing that these expressions, though seemingly opposed, may ultimately point to the same truth through different linguistic frameworks. It also examines how both traditions use language metaphorically to express what lies beyond words. The paper discusses how Indian philosophy, particularly Advaita Vedānta, integrates theoretical insight with practical methods like yoga and meditation for self-realization. In contrast, modern Buddhism, especially in Korea and China, has evolved to focus more on mental well-being and social harmony rather than the pursuit of enlightenment. Finally, the study calls for a broader understanding of these philosophies not as conflicting, but as complementary sources of timeless wisdom. By highlighting their shared emphasis on direct experience and transcendence of ego, it presents them as relevant guides for contemporary life across cultures.
Keywords: Brahman, Śūnyatā, Advaita Vedānta, Buddhism.